RFP Automation and the Human Touch: Where Should We Draw the Line?

Introduction

Automation has become a cornerstone of efficiency in today's business landscape, changing how we toil, communicate, and make decisions. RFP responses, being integral components of sales and growth strategies in many businesses, do not lie outside this purview either. However, while embracing automation, one also needs to understand its limitations and the value of human input that will stand the test of time. This blog post discusses the sensitive balance between leveraging automated tools for RFP responses and retaining the essential human touch.

The Power of Automation in RFP Responses

Automation of RFP responses has quite a few significant advantages:

Time-savings: Automating systems can rapidly collect and insert standard information, such as company background, boilerplate text, and product specifications. What could take hours manually is condensed down to minutes.
Error reduction: By using pre-approved, standardized content, automation reduces the risk of typos, outdated information, or inconsistencies common with manual data entry.
Consistency across proposals: Automation ensures that key messages, branding elements, and core information remain consistent across all proposals, regardless of who works on them.
Focus on customization: handling the routine parts of proposal creation, automation frees the team members to focus on tailoring the proposal to the specific needs and requirements of the client.

A majority of the companies in today's day and age use RFP software. These tools usually come equipped with features such as:

Content libraries store and categorize past proposal content.
Intelligent search functions allow the rapid finding of relevant information.
Auto-fill for standard forms and templates.
Collaboration tools allow team members to work on different sections.
Version control will also enable tracking changes in the proposal and its history.

The Importance of Human Touch

While automation is about efficiency, the human touch will always remain crucial to writing compelling RFP responses. Let us delve a bit deeper into why this is so:

Context: Humans can read between the lines of an RFP and comprehend not only what is explicitly asked for but also the implicit needs and pain points of the prospective client. This unparalleled nuance enables them to write more pointed, relevant responses.

Originality: Truly original ideas or innovative solutions tend to result from human brainstorming and problem-solving. While AI or automation might suggest based on past data, novel approaches usually emanate from human creativity.

Relationships building: A personal touch in a proposal may bring more solid relationships with potential clients. This may include references to past discussions, recognition of the client's specific issues, and expressions of common values.

Adaptability: Man can promptly accommodate special needs or last-minute requirements outside the scope of automated systems. In RFP situations, that is pretty important as the world often lives in dynamic statuses.

How to Get the Balance Right

The secret to successful RFP responses lies in finding a balance between automation and human input. The specifics of the guidelines below are explained in more detail here; you will get the detailed specifications:

Streamline the routine tasks:

Use automation for the following:

Company background information: Standard "About Us" sections, company history, and mission statements.
Standard product or service descriptions: basic features and specifications that don't differ from proposal to proposal.
Compliance statements: boilerplate legal and regulatory compliance statements.
Basic pricing: standard rate cards or pricing tables for commonly offered products or services.

Use a hybrid approach for technical details.

Leave the following to humans:

Custom Solution Accuracy: Detailed descriptions of how your product or service will solve the specific needs of the client can be handled using AI. However, the accuracy of the solution is to be checked by humans for a better final result.
Risk assessments: challenges that may arise and mitigations relevant to each project.

For technical sections:

Automate pulling the relevant past content, like technical specifications or methodology descriptions.
Reviews by subject matter experts customise this to ensure accuracy and relevance for the particular RFP.

AI will also be able to develop an effective strategy based on the identification of patterns, building insights, and further refining solutions based on analysis of data.

General AI tools like ChatGPT or Gemini will not easily provide for the RFP automation process because they are not designed for such tasks. However, there is a more specially designed platform, Inventive.ai which seems better suited to handle the automation of the RFP process. These help in processing the entire activity from response generation to analyzing one's requirements effectively and more efficiently, with accuracy than is possible with other general tools suited for broader applications.

However, the more complex and sophisticated the strategy, the greater the requirement for human input into assessing the viability of options or adapting them to specific conditions.

Industry Leaders' Perspectives on RFP Automation

Many industry leaders and experts have shared their thoughts on RFP automation. Their insights can help us understand the current trends and best practices in the field. Here's what some of them have to say:

Efficiency and time-saving

David Kutcher, CEO of Confluent Forms, emphasizes the time-saving aspect of RFP automation: "RFP automation tools can reduce the time spent on proposal creation by up to 40%. This allows teams to focus on high-value activities like strategy and customization."

Improved Accuracy

Ganesh Shankar, CEO of RFPIO, points out the accuracy benefits: "Automated RFP solutions ensure that your responses are always up-to-date and compliant. This significantly reduces the risk of errors that can cost you a contract."

Data-Driven Decision Making

Sunil Gopinath, CEO of Persistent Systems, highlights the data aspect: "RFP automation isn't just about faster responses. It's about leveraging data from past proposals to make smarter decisions about which opportunities to pursue and how to approach them."

Integration with Other Systems

Brad Douglas, VP of Proposal Management at Shipley Associates, discusses integration: "The most effective RFP automation solutions integrate with CRM and project management tools. This creates a seamless workflow from opportunity identification to proposal submission."

The importance of human oversight

Despite the benefits, many leaders caution against over-reliance on automation. Kim Ostergaard, Head of Sales Operations at Jabra, notes: "Automation is a powerful tool, but it needs human oversight. The most successful companies use automation to handle repetitive tasks while relying on human expertise for strategy and personalization."

Continuous Learning and Improvement

Bob Lohfeld, CEO of Lohfeld Consulting Group, emphasizes the learning aspect: "The best RFP automation systems learn from each proposal. They should analyze win/loss data to continuously improve the quality of responses over time."

Balancing Technology and Personal Touch

Finally, Nic Adams, Managing Director at Strategic Proposals, sums up the balance many leaders advocate for: "The future of RFP responses isn't about choosing between automation and personal touch. It's about using technology to enhance our ability to deliver personalized, compelling proposals at scale."

These insights from industry leaders underscore the potential of RFP automation while also highlighting the ongoing need for human input and oversight. They suggest that the most successful approach is one that leverages technology to handle routine tasks and data management, freeing up human resources to focus on strategy, creativity, and relationship-building.

Industries Where Too Much Automation Can Hurt

In these areas, over-automation can lead to the perception that a company is impersonal or insensitive to the fine points of what a client wants or needs.

Some industries need to be particularly cautious with automation.

Healthcare: Patient care solutions require a deep understanding of complex data i.e. unstructured information such as medical records, clinical results, genetic insights, and lifestyle factors that require thorough analysis. Over-automation can make responses seem generic and disconnected from the realities.

Creative Services: Agencies need to showcase their unique creativity and fresh thinking in every proposal. Automated responses can make an agency seem formulaic rather than innovative.

Consulting: Clients expect tailored advice based on their specific situation. Automated responses might miss crucial nuances or fail to demonstrate the depth of expertise clients are seeking.

Education: Learning programs should reflect an understanding of specific student populations, educational goals, and institutional cultures. Overly automated responses might not capture these nuances effectively.

A Framework for Balancing Efficiency and Empathy

Responding to RFPs is such a complex process, so if one is seeking a balance between efficiency and empathy in their organizations. Efficiency will ensure submissions that happen within budget and with all the technical details necessary. Meanwhile, empathy makes the proposal resonate with what touches the unique needs and challenges of clients, showing depth of understanding beyond mere compliance.

Consider the following for an expanded balance-seeking framework:

Client Assessment

Gather intelligence on their past RFPs and what they like:

Research Past RFPs. Understand what the client favors by researching past RFPs. This will help you know which solutions the client values the most.
Identify criteria for decision making: Understand how your client will make his or her decision, whether by key factors or even scoring systems on how different proposals will be judged.
Tailor changes based on preference: Use the insight to tailor your proposal in a way that will suit their needs. Understanding client preferences allows you to tailor your proposal to their specific needs, increasing your chances of winning.
Industry Standards: Never forget that one has to be industry-specific in tailoring the proposal toward the specific needs and standards of the client's industry.
Review the Client's Timeline: A short timeline might require greater reliance on automation for efficiency, whereas longer timelines can allow for more manual customization.

Project Assessment

Determine if it is a customized solution or standardized approach that is to be undertaken and modify the proposal. For example, in case the requirements were pretty cut and dry and consistent, a standardized solution would be more efficient, whereas, in case of unique problems or changing needs, a customized solution becomes more appropriate.
Are there specific factors that necessitate customization, such as unique business requirements, or will a standardized approach suffice? Identifying these factors early will streamline the proposal development process.
Considering the value of the contract, higher monetary projects may be worth the effort in using more manual customization.

Consider your resources:

Assess your current workload and your current team's capacity for work. Leverage automation for routine tasks to free up your team for higher-level strategy and customization
Recognize what level of expertise you have on hand to customize.
Consider the return on investment of time that is spent on manual customization over using automation.

Set clear roles:

Break down your team into sections with clear assignments as to what each team member will have responsibility for, based on their strengths.
Clearly define what gets automated and what requires a human touch.
Create a feedback/review loop to maintain consistency across automated and human sections.

Review and refine

Always Guarantee that every proposal undergoes a thorough human review before submission: To ensure top-notch quality and catch any errors that automation might overlook. A final review adds a critical layer of precision and professionalism, enhancing the overall effectiveness of your proposal.
Update your content library with successful, manually crafted responses regularly: Regularly update your content library with successful responses and continuously refine your automation process based on feedback from your team and clients.
Create a feedback loop to constantly enhance your automation process. This will help in establishing a solid database and a more streamlined process which will keep improving with time with more information coming.

Conclusion

RFP automation can indeed be a high-octane tool in a business environment moving at lightning speeds. Greatly enhanced efficiency, minimum incidence of errors, and faster response times are just a few advantages. However, this should not be at the cost of human expertise, creativity, and that personal touch, which, more often than not, makes all the difference between a winning proposal and an also-ran.

The point is to find a balance for the particular situation. Automate routine tasks and information so that your team can focus its time and brainpower on more valued work. On the other hand, count on their skills, experiences, and insight into being human for strategy, customization, and relationship building.

Automation efficiency teamed with empathy, coupled with the power of the human touch, will create winning proposals that connect with prospective clients. This would not only meet the technical requirements of the RFP but showcase the differentiated value proposition of your company and your concern for the understanding and fulfilment of specific client needs.

It means business is still about people working with people. The more digital the world gets, the more the human touch, understanding, and levels of trust will remain basic and critical for successful business relationships. Make your RFP responses reflect that human connection, even as you leverage the power of automation to enhance your efficiency and consistency.

You can build RFP responses that are efficient to produce and effective at winning business by taking thought into the balance between automation and human input. This approach lets you scale your RFP efforts with a personal touch without having to sacrifice one or the other, which is often a key differentiator between your company and others within competitive landscapes.

‍